<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A journey to showfoto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kushaldas.in/2008/11/03/a-journey-to-showfoto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kushaldas.in/2008/11/03/a-journey-to-showfoto/</link>
	<description>FOSS and life. Kushal Das talks here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kofler</title>
		<link>http://kushaldas.in/2008/11/03/a-journey-to-showfoto/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kofler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kushaldas.in/?p=330#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>Installing packages from Rawhide on F9 is a bad idea (in particular when you post about it to a blog which inexperienced users will read). It can in quite some cases drag in a lot of packages from Rawhide due to the network of dependencies (in both directions). Why didn&#039;t you use the F9 build from kde-redhat unstable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installing packages from Rawhide on F9 is a bad idea (in particular when you post about it to a blog which inexperienced users will read). It can in quite some cases drag in a lot of packages from Rawhide due to the network of dependencies (in both directions). Why didn&#8217;t you use the F9 build from kde-redhat unstable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cláudio da Silveira Pinheiro</title>
		<link>http://kushaldas.in/2008/11/03/a-journey-to-showfoto/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Cláudio da Silveira Pinheiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kushaldas.in/?p=330#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t help but notice the model seems to look directly at an orb (bottom left of the picture). Was that photo taken on Halloween? :)
You have good skills. Keep clicking! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but notice the model seems to look directly at an orb (bottom left of the picture). Was that photo taken on Halloween? :)<br />
You have good skills. Keep clicking! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete b.</title>
		<link>http://kushaldas.in/2008/11/03/a-journey-to-showfoto/comment-page-1/#comment-2058</link>
		<dc:creator>pete b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kushaldas.in/?p=330#comment-2058</guid>
		<description>DigiKam is one of the best tools I know of. I have a similar workflow as you. Postprocessing (basically sharpening) is still done by GIMP but all the other stuff is done by DigiKam. To put in few words, DigiKam is a masterpiece. If the devs also implement fancy transition effects during presentations they will even beat (the rather annoying) iPhoto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DigiKam is one of the best tools I know of. I have a similar workflow as you. Postprocessing (basically sharpening) is still done by GIMP but all the other stuff is done by DigiKam. To put in few words, DigiKam is a masterpiece. If the devs also implement fancy transition effects during presentations they will even beat (the rather annoying) iPhoto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

