Comments on: Big Bazaar steals photograph http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/ FOSS and life. Kushal Das talks here Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:20:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nicu http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-3203 nicu Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:50:53 +0000 http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/#comment-3203 oh, now i see the comments on flickr, it used to be a CC NC license, the copyright infringement still stay, this is the very definition of commercial use. oh, now i see the comments on flickr, it used to be a CC NC license, the copyright infringement still stay, this is the very definition of commercial use.

]]> By: nicu http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-3202 nicu Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:47:34 +0000 http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/#comment-3202 The original photo is posted on flickr as "© All rights reserved", so there are two things at work: - copyright infringement - unauthorised use of someone image (no model release forms) What can I say? i already hear "cha-ching!" if the company is hit with lawsuits by the photographer and the model. The original photo is posted on flickr as “© All rights reserved”, so there are two things at work:
- copyright infringement
- unauthorised use of someone image (no model release forms)

What can I say? i already hear “cha-ching!” if the company is hit with lawsuits by the photographer and the model.

]]> By: sankarshan http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-3195 sankarshan Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:39:57 +0000 http://kushaldas.in/2009/10/06/big-bazaar-steals-photograph/#comment-3195 What does "steals" mean here ? Is it a case of attribution missing or, did the photograph had an explicit no commercial usage without permission license ? What does “steals” mean here ? Is it a case of attribution missing or, did the photograph had an explicit no commercial usage without permission license ?

]]>